Search
Go

Shop by category

Brands

  • Coleman
  • Char-Griller
  • Bruder
  • Little Tikes
  • The First Years
  • Yamaha
 
Donegan C-624 Classic Rectangular Hand Reader, 2-1/8x Magnification, 4.5 Diopers, 9" Focal Length, 2" x 4" Lens Size
Email a friendView larger image

Donegan C-624 Classic Rectangular Hand Reader, 2-1/8x Magnification, 4.5 Diopers, 9" Focal Length, 2" x 4" Lens Size

List Price: $14.40
Our Price: $13.50 & eligible for FREE Super Saver Shipping on orders over $25.
You Save: $0.90 ( 6%)
SKU:

DONC624-GP

In Stock
Usually ships in 1 business days
Only 5 left in stock, order soon!

Note: Item may be sold and shipped by another company. Learn more.
Description:

Classic Hand Reader Designed with the user in mind. This lightweight 2" x 4" hand reader is perfect size reader. The attractive black ergonomically designed handle truly makes this magnifier one of the classics.

Features:

Magnifies 2-1/8X at a 9" focal length


Light weight ergonomic classic handle design


Crystal clear optical grade acrylic lens manufactured to precise optical standards


Perfect for reading


Product Details:
Product Length: 9.4 inches
Product Width: 6.3 inches
Product Height: 1.4 inches
Package Length: 10.0 inches
Package Width: 6.2 inches
Package Height: 1.4 inches
Package Weight: 0.05 pounds
Average Customer Rating: based on 2 reviews
Customer Reviews:
Average Customer Review: 4.0 ( 2 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.


Most Helpful Customer Reviews

1 of 1 found the following review helpful:

5Does what I wantedOct 15, 2011
By Bobby L. Tefft
I've had no problem with this magnifier. It helps me see things that are on the tiny side. It was a nice little built in "super magnifier circle", too.

3Rectangular's The Way To GoNov 15, 2011
By Jorge F. Reynolds
In general, I 'insist' on this shape. It allows both my eyes to easily focus on a particular point and I find, especially over time, that this results in much less eye strain.

I do wish the lens were 1" larger, however; that would make scanning page-wide lines of text much easier.

And a glass rather than plastic lense, tho weighing more, would be [$$$} ideal.

I'm not really comfortable about the grade of plastic used here and, totally without proof other than 'feel', fear it will not withstand scratching.

Naturally, the 'eyeglass' materials I've grown used to would also be awfully expensive.

About Us   Contact Us
Privacy Policy Copyright © , Best Service Stores. All rights reserved.
Web business powered by Amazon WebStore